Given, Manning had an amazing second half of the season. But, his first eight games looked similar to Brett Favre's last five. In those first eight, the Colts lost four and Manning had four multi-interception games and managed a quarterback rating over 100 only twice.
From week 9 on, Manning threw 17 touchdowns with just three interceptions and the Colts won each game. Unbelievable, right? But can you really give someone the Most Valuable Player award when they were only valuable after week 9?
Statistically, Manning isn't even the best quarterback. Four quarterbacks had higher QB ratings, five threw for more yards and four had more touchdowns.
If anyone was MVP, it was the Colts offensive line, who allowed only 14 sacks of Manning all season.
It has truly become insulting that the award is still called Most Valuable Player. Most Valuable Quarterback is more like it. Why even bother allowing other positions to win the award when eight quarterbacks have won MVP in the last 10 years.
The last non-quarterback or running back to win the award was in 1986. Twenty-two straight years without the other positions on the field even being mentioned. If you think the most valuable player in the league was a quarterback in every one of those seasons, you'd be more confused than ESPN executives at an Ethics in Broadcasting seminar.
There are two non-quarterback candidates that should have placed ahead of Manning. Falcons running back Michael Turner and Cowboys linebacker DeMarcus Ware.
Turner finished second in the NFL in yards with 1699, only 61 behind Vikings running back Adrian Peterson. Turner scored 17 touchdowns (seven more than Peterson) and only fumbled three times (six less than Peterson).
But what makes Turner the MVP isn't just his statistics, it's the role he played in turning a broken Falcons team into a playoff contender. Averaging 4.5 yards per carry controlled the clock and kept the Falcons defense off the field. Turner kept the Falcons in second-and-short, opening up the downfield passing game, which Roddy White and Matt Ryan fully took advantage of.
Being the most important player on a team who goes from 4-12 to 11-5 automatically makes you valuable, but putting up those fantasy stats like Turner did should have put him at the top of the heap. No dice, apparently the AP didn't see any Michael Turner Wonder Bread, Subway, Addidas, etc. etc. etc. commercials that they've seen Manning on.
DeMarcus Ware had the best season for a linebacker since Derrick Thomas in 1990. Ware had 20 sacks, 86 tackles and six forced fumbles. Ware had three of those sacks against the defending Super Bowl champ New York Giants.
When Lawrence Taylor won MVP in 1986, he had 20.5 sacks. Maybe it was the .5. Otherwise, considering there wasn't an obvious offensive MVP, Ware should have been at least somewhere near the top of the voting.
Since Ware isn't a quarterback and was no where near as publicized as his premodanna teammates Romo and Owens, he didn't make the radar. Ware will likely win the defensive MVP, but why is it always the offensive guy who is more valuable? Was Trent Dilfer more valuable than Ray Lewis on the 2001 Super Bowl champion Ravens?
It's all about bells and whistles with these guys. It's the reason Joe Namath is a Hall of Famer. It's the reason eight of the last nine Heisman Trophy winners were quarterbacks. Not because it's deserved, but because they are in the lime light and our friends with the AP are blinded.