When you think of journalism without integrity, you think E channel.
When you picture amoral reporting, you see National Inquirer.
But for me, what comes to mind first these days is ESPN.
Last week viewers were forced to suffer through analyst after analyst sorting out the repercussions of a David Ortiz jersey being buried in the new Yankee Stadium.
I don’t know about you, but this story reminded me of such headlines as, “Oprah gains 140 lbs,” and, “Man gives birth to gigantic turtle baby.”
I awoke to ESPN News reporting that Ortiz’s early season slump had been broken because of the unearthing of the jersey. Hmm, you wouldn’t think Papi’s 268 career home runs or .382 OBP would have anything to do with him not staying below .100, right? No, it had to be the jersey.
If there was any productive unearthing, it was the digging up of some problems I’ve been having with America’s favorite sports network.
We’ll start with the shameless promotion of only the sports that are played on ESPN. Example, NHL hockey.
Though attendance at NHL games in 2007-08 averaged around 16,000 per game, Sportscenter continued to show more MLS highlights (Major League Soccer for those who care so little they don’t even know the acronym) while hockey analyst Barry Melrose sat in the dark collecting dust.
But because ESPN shows MLS games, they are reported on. So, according to them, hockey is only America’s fourth favorite sport if its shown on their network.
And is it any coincidence that 1st and 10, PTI and Around The Horn never seem to have any NHL based questions? I think not.
But moving forth on the Lutheran like list of grievances. On to the NFL.
First of all, when the Major League Baseball season is starting and both the NBA and NHL are entering their playoffs, why is ESPN showing an hour long special on NFL team schedules?
Not to mention NFL Live keeping its slot through the entire off season. Ok fellas, only seven more months to go. Thanks Sean Salisbury, but in the month of March, the good-ole boys are really stretching for stories.
I can’t decide which is worse, seeing the latest photos of TomKat on a beach in Monaco or hearing the latest Brett Favre teaser quote about coming out of retirement.
The Society of Professional Journalists: Code of Ethics states that, “Journalists should be honest, fair and courageous in gathering, reporting and interpreting information.”
If we call reporting on a supernatural #34 courageous and only doing it because Yankees / Red Sox is on ESPN Sunday Night Baseball fair and honest, then we have a problem.
But moving on to another thorn in my craw, the women of ESPN.
Aren’t we a little tired of some ditzy blond running up to Kobe Bryant at half time asking him, “How did you feel after you hit that three-pointer?”
Isn’t a little sad that, even though there is a large contingency of talented women in sports journalism, all the ESPN ladies sit and read a teleprompter and pass it off to the all-male crew of analysts?
This is a network where women ask the questions but never give the answers, they stand on the sidelines but never sit in the booth, ESPN gives females in sports broadcasting the idea that they should be baking a pie while the men are talking, and this is outright offensive.
In the end, we’re talking about a place where Jeter jump tosses and Johnson HOF jackets are king, the offensive line doesn’t exist and there‘s no such thing as a successful sac fly.
To me, it isn’t honest journalism to have the power to inform the public about the intricate aspects of sports but choose to use self promoting reporting and mindless fluff for the peripheral fan.
Tuesday, April 22, 2008
VOTE PAUL...no not Ron, Chris
Every once in awhile an NBA player has a legendary season. Jordan in 95-96, Magic in 86-87, Nash in 05-06. A season that fans will look back on and talk about for years to come.
Add Chris Paul’s 2007-08 to the list.
Paul’s 21 points, 11 assists and almost three steals per game are comparable to Nash’s back to back MVP seasons, but the most important statistic is being overlooked by analysts: Turnovers per game.
Paul, a point guard, averages only 2.5 turnovers a game. That may not seem all that important until one dives deeper.
During Magic Johnson’s MVP season of 1986-87, he averaged 3.8 turnovers per game. Nash 3.5 in 05-06.
Both fellow point guards averaged less steals than Paul, who is taking the ball away more than he is giving it up, a feat almost impossible at that position.
Paul’s personal statistics amaze, but what may be more astounding is his ability to get the most out of his teammates.
NBA analyst and former Knicks and Rockets coach Jeff Van Gundy said, “Paul is clearly the MVP, he’s made the most impact by far, (David) West was an all-star because of him and he’s gotten a lot out of (Tyson) Chandler as well.”
Before joining Paul in New Orleans, Tyson Chandler was averaging just five points and nine rebounds a game in Chicago, but since he’s improved to an 11 point 11 rebound powerhouse center.
Paul’s leadership abilities have shown through while winning the southwest division and during multiple wins against the league’s best Boston Celtics.
So why are fans and analysts picking Kobe Bryant or LeBron James for MVP?
Because Paul lacks the media coverage of a LeBron and Hollywood star power of Kobe. He isn’t featured during every commercial break or seen at any movie premiers.
Beside star influence, flashy scoring and ESPN highlight reels give James and Bryant the edge, but the numbers just don’t add up.
Kobe’s 28 points and six rebounds per game are impressive, but averaging three turnovers and just five assists leaves him far short of Paul when it comes to being a complete player.
One must also consider that the acquisition of star power forward Pau Gasol has made life a lot easier on Bryant this season.
As for James, playing in the abysmal Eastern Conference makes him automatically less valuable than Bryant or Paul.
Plus, as a shooting guard, he averages over three turnovers a game and shoots just .315 from beyond the arc.
To add to James poor shooting, 71 percent from the free throw line falls well short of Paul’s 85 percent.
Though being a humble leader, unselfish passer and intelligent decision maker don’t often end up on the stat sheet, they are categories in which Chris Paul has truly stood above the rest. His 2007-08 season has been, well, Magic-al.
A resent fan poll on ESPN.com had Bryant getting 50 percent of the MVP vote, luckily it isn’t up to the Powerade drinking, basketball shoe wearing NBA enthusiast.
We can only wait and hope that the sports writers don’t award simply scoring and stardom
Add Chris Paul’s 2007-08 to the list.
Paul’s 21 points, 11 assists and almost three steals per game are comparable to Nash’s back to back MVP seasons, but the most important statistic is being overlooked by analysts: Turnovers per game.
Paul, a point guard, averages only 2.5 turnovers a game. That may not seem all that important until one dives deeper.
During Magic Johnson’s MVP season of 1986-87, he averaged 3.8 turnovers per game. Nash 3.5 in 05-06.
Both fellow point guards averaged less steals than Paul, who is taking the ball away more than he is giving it up, a feat almost impossible at that position.
Paul’s personal statistics amaze, but what may be more astounding is his ability to get the most out of his teammates.
NBA analyst and former Knicks and Rockets coach Jeff Van Gundy said, “Paul is clearly the MVP, he’s made the most impact by far, (David) West was an all-star because of him and he’s gotten a lot out of (Tyson) Chandler as well.”
Before joining Paul in New Orleans, Tyson Chandler was averaging just five points and nine rebounds a game in Chicago, but since he’s improved to an 11 point 11 rebound powerhouse center.
Paul’s leadership abilities have shown through while winning the southwest division and during multiple wins against the league’s best Boston Celtics.
So why are fans and analysts picking Kobe Bryant or LeBron James for MVP?
Because Paul lacks the media coverage of a LeBron and Hollywood star power of Kobe. He isn’t featured during every commercial break or seen at any movie premiers.
Beside star influence, flashy scoring and ESPN highlight reels give James and Bryant the edge, but the numbers just don’t add up.
Kobe’s 28 points and six rebounds per game are impressive, but averaging three turnovers and just five assists leaves him far short of Paul when it comes to being a complete player.
One must also consider that the acquisition of star power forward Pau Gasol has made life a lot easier on Bryant this season.
As for James, playing in the abysmal Eastern Conference makes him automatically less valuable than Bryant or Paul.
Plus, as a shooting guard, he averages over three turnovers a game and shoots just .315 from beyond the arc.
To add to James poor shooting, 71 percent from the free throw line falls well short of Paul’s 85 percent.
Though being a humble leader, unselfish passer and intelligent decision maker don’t often end up on the stat sheet, they are categories in which Chris Paul has truly stood above the rest. His 2007-08 season has been, well, Magic-al.
A resent fan poll on ESPN.com had Bryant getting 50 percent of the MVP vote, luckily it isn’t up to the Powerade drinking, basketball shoe wearing NBA enthusiast.
We can only wait and hope that the sports writers don’t award simply scoring and stardom
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
